FOOTNOTES PAGE DECEMBER 2013

Begun 12-3-13

12-1-13:(sc) math problem un4m~ulated. (NFRY)
12-2-13(cont.) Too Random... Righty? 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 (the point ?)
[4 the record : 3 squared? ]
12-3-13: Parallel [!] un-Pink Floyd, He- /^\ , van-NO JOKE, ven-Rough Philosophy, Cry- / Star Chamber Revisited, river- / creek ? 

rtd 12-3-13

Retrieved from draft 12-13-13
State Theory <- heading // lede -> and duality // trinity/body  Headings and^ Leadership*. (dynamics)
  ^    of/or 8:  Snooze/Dream(4,6) *prof(it)C? (7,8) Bane or Right?  [Not to blog both ends against the middle.]
Don’t celebrate yet!: Why Boehner won’t really ditch the right-wing nutjobs. /  The Christian right wants civilization to collapse / (3/5) Head ~ Lead Paul Krugman: The GOP’s austerity agenda is winning / My critics have “income envy”: Ed Schultz unloads after backlash to his union quote 
Dual / nd: When will the media learn? Conservatives are not “centrists”! / 3 essential (and ignored) questions about Detroit’s bankruptcy  Try Ad of Caution?  (not fully read yet) (anachronistic construction) (duel conflation)~ (bc: bubble critics)  OW Hegel ~ Liebniz [!]
RTD


12-23-13 (4) A.  Rubric's Cube and Rhetorical Realmifications., B. What's good for the goose? Goose the gander! c. Snooze Alarm d. Tony Baloney e. WWW Wisconsin Lesson? f. We Need Ed  g, What's good for the goose...

12-27-13 
12-28-13 1 Was Wittgenstein Right? or behind [?^] 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 9  // 10 / 11
^ insert a - h
12-29-13 - Original 5 links.  A. Frank O File? B. Pi cAP Delta rOW(USC) C. 1. Inverse Reality?,  2.(i), 3. Fair and Balanced..., D. Wittgenstein , E. Re-Mix  ///
12-30  F.rough- 1. Punderous Ponderings , 2. State of Politics , 3. A Revolution? 4.Un-Exceptionalism 5.  , G.notes^ -1. 2.Heuristic Concurrence and  3.My Respects to Those who Celebrate. (re-search*) , H.math^^ - 1. Too Random... , 2., 3.Bury the lede?, 4. ROW MAN #Sign [Numeral (i)] . *(under the case of not fully read yet, but back to math... why now 16?  too cubed by two? Speculation that the 5th perspective is from apart too pun? The three-body problem regards intitial circumstances from within or without. R 1st 3 models different than recently added.  The pow#r of i(V)?

Too Random...

...Righty[!]

Knot 2 fraught with fraud'nfreud? 
Freedom the foundation or fountainhead? 
A stopped clock is right... 
too undimention,
1* over infinity has left. 


* poetic license in 3 or 4-D.
won over


**

knot exactly; 1/infinity= zorro?

But seriously to unpun one in particular, freedom over everything is the problem. 
Freedom over everything equals nothing over physics.



12-2-13 (...)added and *reframed

** s/b standard mobius/infinity (Thought I had previously used one, not this one.)

Embedded links:(Not fully read.)
1.  The Difficulty with Hegel
2.  Hegel or Anti-Hegel

Fully Read and Reviewing:
The Hegel Myth and its Method: (Kaufmann 1959)Akin to Plato's Form(The Socratics of the Ideal and States)^
Selections:
"The writings of Hegel and Plato abound in admittedly one-sided statements that are clearly meant to formulate points of view that are then shown to be inadequate and are countered by another perspective. Thus an impressive quilt quotation could be patched together to convince gullible readers that Hegel was — depending on the “scholar’s” plans — either emphatically for or utterly opposed to, say, “equality.” But the understanding of Hegel would be advanced ever so much more by citing one of his remarks about equality in context, showing how it is a step in an argument that is designed to lead the reader to a better comprehension of equality and not to enlist his emotions either for it or against it."

"Hegel was rarely cited in the Nazi literature, and, when he was referred to, it was usually by way of disapproval. (...) Rosenberg also stressed, and excoriated, the “Socratic” elements in Plato."

References to 3D/4M@.  English***, Math, Form~process.
*** generic word language/numbers as an ideal and a language/so-called results.

I do not necessarily want to break out of my understanding of Hegel, not say he would have understood it my way or anyone else's.  But is Popper properly popped?  Yet I do use a method of labelism/reference/progression-digression.  The hazards of the Internet, not to mention old material, one might not recall running into sources before.  I developed my tetrahedron courtesy of my older work on The Republic(1970~), delineating the mass-energy equivalence formula, and possibly Milo Wolff.(2004~)

In the above not yet reads, but glanced at's, they may have a point, and may be missing or pointing from their own point.  I may yet to agree or disagree with them, but still appreciate or depreciate their points. 
^ & ~ must be reviewed.  "Dates~" note time of encounter.

12-3-13 (FP1) Have yet to locate "^". [rtd]

12-4-13 That's the ticket ! ?



But to tilt at swans?

12-9-13 Roughly 13 in rough. 

12-10-13 Scientific American Dispute over Infinity Divides Mathematicians
verses RealClearPolitics Newtonian Government
Trinity Squared ? 

Spare the ROD

Read of Day ?*

Speaking of Spare...

* OMGOP

M^: A Shot in the Arm?, Neo-Perspectivism

^ 5th dimension : Tails Aside (sc) [ ? ]

OLO?

4-13-15 ?!?  [~]

(fp?) mobius :A.  THE TRUTH APPARENT: A MOBIUS LAP , B. , C.  Too Random... , D. Re:Figure , E. Rough Riders , F. The Undisclosed Bunker Branch of the Government. G. Borrow and Twist- a surfing metaphor? , H. Stuart Smally Anyone? , I. RUNNING WITH RHETORIC .

More Gill Let?

More Flex-balls ?
Fertil~ized ?
More Cowbell?

M: Tale of Two Bullies!Tale of Two Bullies!, C:O/ Caging Godzillas , W/ On the level...
F: (*)Carry On Comment!, Perspectivism, The Other Debates, Jeb Bush is full of Cow Pie! , Whistle Blowing in the Dark?, Z: Neo-changian? , (*)Recycling Trash, Here We Go Again, D&R Tan ya?, ?: Too Random...
or: A? Anticipation Project ^, P? Politics Local and National
FB? The Guardian?

[image tbi ] 

more cowbell









[image tbi ]  ( )

[finally/gnot exactly]
[But a D'R win of some de men shun.]






i. Bury the lede?
e. i.e. S.E. (vi) edgy

NFRY~(not fully rel8d yet)
Not 2 B  con`fused ... w/o?
(FN^)  The Other Debates, Perspectivism, Jeb Bush is full of Cow Pie!
oar
o.w. / or Pen ta go(~)'N ?

Let Alone... D(R)N~A ?*
   
* Ctrl F~M-beds @ S. .C 
C-O~W[tbK(o)?] nPS?
WTB ? [!] (.  .  .)

FOOTNOTES PAGE #2 MARCH 2014

3-11-14 : edited a bit ref [ ] *...[2] The Battle of Milieu., (b.s.) (a)State Theory** (b)Too Random..., (c.)The LESS THAN pentagonal file:, (d)Bury the lede?, ** Un-Social Darwinism, Herbert Spencer(label)

*Ref:
**[Speaking of Tome Writer] non-standard [Tome] unM-bed

★Re-initialism★

Major Fail or ... Hume or ? ... *

* Too Random...

(Pre-post-or-us ?)
{Note # labels.  Not to frac' or fudge.}

The point is that I finally read this piece(see bold Hume) which is very Hegelian.
~~~
I have also yet to insert ma hat pa mamby. ~~~ **
~~~

[  MF'4  ]  4-30-14

[5-1-14 Incidentalism?  Who started it {?}]
~~~ Sandel/Huntington Revisited ~~~
** photos still on tablet

Footnotes Page One May 2016

Nominalism:  5-30-16
Peter Abelard*: (b.s.) a. Too Random..., b. Literally, c.  In the Beginning,  d. GOT ED!
Theodicy: NFRY

*"Hence, Abelard concludes, universality is not an ontological feature of the world but a semantic feature of language."

Filed to Read.

Ctrl F "anachronistic"

blog search (b.s.) anachronistic*

(search: 4th dunn)
(b.s.) a. Anachronistic Reasoning?, b. Faux Campaign, c. FAUX NEWS!, (e.), f. Clause Wits (3.0)?, (g)host Busters, h. Roar Shack, i. A Tail of Caution, ( j. ), k. ether note, l. F'n P[!]  m. War'n Buffet Rule , n. By Polar , o. From 17A to 37B, p. Killing Fields of Dreams,  q. Future Bubble? , (r.).

*anomaly knot
(_) Rat Races Van Mices?, The LESS THAN pentagonal file:, Bury the lede?, Too Random...,

[ Picture Theory: 1. The Curve or Nuance Thing, 2. For Words!, (3.), 4. GOP Plan to Hurt Economy
Speaking of timing [!] Philosophy Now links may be free for limited time. Democracy is not.
On meaning. / War On/Or Terrorism ? , MoveOn , Decider Stays Course., FAST REVERSE or BACKTRACK BEFORE FAST TRACK , ]

Footnotes Page Two JUNE 2014

Re:b.s.[!] (FP2)  Check Heading [i.e. (s.c.) FP2 above]
2B FP2 6-4-14
(hegel+popper) Too Random..., (fp1), Reigning Wags and Tales., Knot 2B3, (fp2,11-13).
(maslow+needs) Maslow Search , TruthOut.org
(heirarchy) Intelligence Gathering, Battle of Amendments?, C. BLANK NETWORK, D. Ditto Heads Unite!, Post-Pyth?.
Speaking of Rhodes. (It was under my radar)

C.P.U.

Citizens Progressives Untied [!]*

* Ctrl F WeGeBoard
(FP!)
1. Too Random...
2. Coin-age of the day. , Post-Pyth?
3. FP-3-14, Rat Races Van Mices?
4. Woh?
(*)
5. FP-4-13, Culture War.

Now WeGotEd! 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
But back to CPU or Mary Shelly!
Or who cast the first stein ?

FOOTNOTES PAGES PAGE TWO MAY 2014

5-4-14 Model Theory 1. Too Random... , 2A. Pare a digM, Pair a docs., B.Kant we get along..., C.A Plan to B-Team

5-7-14: Re:Knee Calm Pend E Um, A E iou

WTF or WTO: Re:above 5-29-14 branching under consideration.
i.e. trek checkers and di-men-shuns. Knot to mantel brought.
A. Presidential SOTU / NSA: No Saviors Associated or rather change agents?
B. C. de ?  >< <>  These last 2 indicate that I rarely read if ever actually notice my listed blogs if they are even accessable to others.  Which is very demonstrative of my work in progress, as I cannot easily even locate them.  Oh, they are under my Reading List, obviously. In other words, they bare know baring on my bearing.  I pun you not, 4eye have truly yet to read these latest.
BTW:  similar sent'meants to a host of other hosts.  Randy, Thom, Norm, to hint but 3 or malloy.  Not to trail off but local matters also pertain: Cantwell, Murray, Smith etc.  

Bury the lede?

Or bury the hatchet?(1)

To be cautious, I am speaking of journalism and myth.  To be clear, I have not finished viewing the latter, but the former is certainly an example of Popperism and both contain quilting.**  



Facebook Being Liberal

FYI wars?

(1) YouTubes: [Social Darwinism 1] counterexample? [Bill Gates...Alex Jones]
c. Too Random... / A Tale of Two Manicheans.
d. The Hegel Myth and Its Method
e.^ Proxymoron? / Social Darwinism? / Social Darwinism 2.0[!] / Catch-44 / Pink Floyd / (FP) / Di-Spencer With... /  (FP)  / Battle of Amendments? /  Now the Un-Voodoo Math / Un-Social Darwinism. / The Daily Counter Balance / Where everyone needs to read... / "a royal huff" / Mocumentary: Expelled (Exposed?)

[Label check*, with all the irony of the History Channel.]

* Social Darwinism label as of this date: Bury the lede? / Kant we get along... / 2 Reid's later? / Di-Spencer With...
^ the un-quilting of Social Darwinism
un-related?
** quilting: Ctrl F "quilt"
[Re:genre?] HA !

The LESS THAN pentagonal file:

to pun on circular file:
to be filed to reads.

Not read, yet glanced at, and filed in a particular order:^^
Dark Affinities: Liberal and Neoliberal
Each society determines which thoughts and feelings shall be permitted to arrive at the level of awareness and which have to remain unconscious. Just as there is a social character, there is also a "social unconscious."
- Eric Fromm  ^

Mike Lofgren | Gates Agonistes
"Eyeless in Gaza, at the mill with slaves."
– John Milton, Samson Agonistes

Chris Hedges | What Obama Really Meant Was...

Two Obama Lies Leave Little Room for Privacy Rights

And MORE THAN** TRIANGULAR FILE.

Caution: There may be quilting.

[Deep google of the day*]

*not every day nor maybe ever(hypospectral)

** lucky glance of the day ^
Gregory D. Johnsen wrote, "Maybe it shouldn't be so surprising that Congress didn't think about how the war would end when it passed the AUMF on Sept. 14, 2001, but after more than a dozen years, we are no closer to an answer."

^ (b.s.) sorted in reverse order:
z.- (s.c.) Pink Floyd ,
y.- (no Hoyle),
x.- Epicyclical Poet Tree, Fiddle Sticks^, c. , d. Update
w.- It's Obama's Turn, d. Are We "IN" Yet?, e. Stay the Comity of Course ...h. Notes from Al-Qaeda , l. I'm not a lawyer but... , s. FEINGOLD'S STAKE(a-s)

v.- Coordinary
u.- Coin-age of the day., Epicyclical Poet Tree, Relavent, Forward (Ironically)(a-d)

r.- The LESS THAN pentagonal file: Bury the lede? Too Random... (a-c)

Not my intent to be so geo-patch worked.  But to clarify a bit.  After my Neo-Platonic^^ primes of physics, psychology, philosophy and politics. Obama has his concerns as Commander-in-Chief, Leader of the Free World and facilitator of change, in the realm of economics and world pieces.  

^^ not that I am using the term correctly [!]

^  1-22-14 Not that I got there yet.
^^ 1-23-14 punctuation added

Link to be found later...

or tangent.

Let alone course correction.

5-5-15
Speaking of trolling, I am fishing for a recent snag in my seine net or gill in my safety-net.  Somewhere in the area of foreign policy or economics, I recognized a contradiction in my lede-or-ship.  Bingo. 

(FP of sorts)
 [a thru i: order of link -- numerical order of insert.]
a 1, Five Things Ben Carson Doesn’t Get
b 2, A., B. C3-PO?, C., D., E., F. The Other Debates, G. Karl Rove vs. WA Hyperbole, H. Toll Keen, the Try-Logy?  , I. Toll Keen?
c 8, We R all Right?
d 9 Too Random... , (fp-11-13)
e 6
f  5
g 4
h 3
i 7 Divide to conquer?

[Elements to Hegel over ... ?]
[ MSNBC: AM inside joke Obama Letterman Dominoes! The Cycle. SB(t) Stochastic blowback or Honeypot? ]
[Seg way Hardball* Charlie/Bernie: Top 14 increased over bottom 130 million net.]

* 5-6-15 link attempt failed test
x, y, z
u, v, w?